| 1) |
Faster, more efficient patient processing during a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) |
| |
a) |
Field Tests: Less than 10 seconds to enter patient data during Triage Operation |
| |
b) |
Field Tests: Less than 5 seconds to enter patient data during Transport Operation |
| 2) |
Increased patient accountability |
| |
a) |
Proactive, real-time patient information available to incident control, hospital control, and area hospitals |
| 3) |
Improved hospital capacity management |
| 4) |
Redundant, mission-critical application infrastructure |
| 5) |
Comprehensive, real-time reporting |
| 1) |
Easy to use graphical user interface promotes system acceptance and use |
| |
a) |
Field Tests: First time users were up and running in less than 2 minutes without questions. |
| 2) |
Manual, Barcode & RFID (radio frequency identification) data collection |
| |
a) |
Multiple input methods provide redundancy and efficiency to the data collection operations of first responders. |
| 3) |
WLAN & WWAN data transmission |
| |
a) |
Multiple transmission methods provide redundancy and faster routing of information over “best available” switching protocols |
| 4) |
Tier-1 data centers |
| |
a) |
Multiple geographic disparate data centers provide network redundancy in cases where MCI events affect local infrastructure. |
| 5) |
Approved by SOP |
| |
|